Janet Roster v. State of Florida
── Janet Roster v. State of Florida ──
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date: April 24, 2026
Category: General
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2023-4107
Lower Tribunal No. 20000442F
_____________________________
JANET ROSTER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County.
Shannon H. McFee, Judge.
April 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Mosley v. State, 100 So. 3d 1214, 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA
2012) (concluding “based on the unique circumstances of this case that the State
presented sufficient evidence of the requisite statutory weight for trafficking” when
both “the aggregate substance” and “each individual empty baggie” were found to
contain the controlled substance after chemical testing); Bell v. State, 835 So. 2d
392, 394 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“In considering the motion [to dismiss], ‘the State is
entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence, and all inferences
should be resolved against the defendant.’” (quoting State v. Pasko, 815 So. 2d
680, 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))).
WOZNIAK, WHITE and MIZE, JJ., concur.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and David L. Redfearn, Assistant Public Defender,
Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}