Close Armstrong, LLC v. Trunkline Gas Company, LLC

── Close Armstrong, LLC v. Trunkline Gas Company, LLC ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Date: April 24, 2026 Category: General United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 24, 2026 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge CANDACE JACKSON-AKIWUMI, Circuit Judge NANCY L. MALDONADO, Circuit Judge No. 24-1630 CLOSE ARMSTRONG, LLC, et al., Appeal from the United States District Plaintiffs-Appellants, Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. v. Nos. 3:18-cv-00270 & 3:18-cv-00494 TRUNKLINE GAS COMPANY, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Damon R. Leichty, District Judge. ORDER All members of the panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing filed on April 14, 2026. The petition therefore is DENIED. Page 2, second sentence, of the opinion issued on March 31, 2026, is amended to read: With that goal in mind, the landowners filed suit to define the scope of the easement as limited to the area immediately surrounding the existing pipeline. Page 5, first paragraph, of the opinion issued on March 31, 2026, is amended to read: No. 24-1630 Page 2 Both landowners filed suit—Close Armstrong in state court and the Dicksons later in federal court—seeking a declaration to locate and limit the scope of Trunkline’s easement. After removing Close Armstrong’s complaint to federal court, Trunkline counterclaimed in each action seeking its own declaration that the burden of its easement was unlimited. The district court consolidated the cases and divided the litigation into two phases. Both phases resulted in partial summary judgment in Trunkline’s favor.