All States › Indiana › Robert Altice › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Mar 01, 2026

Samuel Jude Clark v. State of Indiana

── Samuel Jude Clark v. State of Indiana ── Case No.: 19A-CR-00172 Court: Indiana Court of Appeals Date: August 27, 2019 Author: Judge Robert Altice County of Origin: Tippecanoe Category: Criminal Decision: Remanded and Affirmed Judge Kirsch and Judge Vaidik concur Case Summary A jury found Samuel Jude Clark guilty of theft, conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice, and obstruction of justice, all Level 6 felonies. Clark admitted to being a habitual offender. He appeals and raises three issues that we restate as: I. Can Clark, who admitted to being a habitual offender, challenge the habitual offender adjudication on direct appeal by claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective? II.
Indiana Judicial Branch
https://public.courts.in.gov/Decisions/api/Document/Opinion?Id=p51QPictFdBR8eUB…
Robert Altice Indiana Court of Appeals Judge
Share on X Share on Facebook
← Back to Robert Altice's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}