People v. Bautista CA3
── People v. Bautista CA3 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: April 23, 2026
Category: General
Filed 4/23/26 P. v. Bautista CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
THE PEOPLE, C102423
Plaintiff and Respondent,
(Super. Ct. No. 23FE014450)
v.
NATIVIDAD MANZANO BAUTISTA,
Defendant and Appellant.
A jury found defendant Natividad Manzano Bautista guilty of multiple crimes
after he repeatedly punched and stabbed one victim and stabbed another victim. The trial
court sentenced him to eight years in state prison. Defendant appeals, arguing the court
prejudicially erred when it (1) relied on the same facts twice (dual use) to impose both a
three-year enhancement, as well as the upper term on counts one and three, and (2) found
he lacked remorse and relied on that factor in imposing the upper term. We agree and
will vacate the sentence and remand the case for further litigation as may be necessary,
and a full resentencing. We otherwise affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2023, defendant was arrested after he repeatedly punched and stabbed Silvia
and stabbed her daughter, H. He was charged with multiple crimes as a result, and the
case proceeded to jury trial.
1
At trial, the prosecution presented evidence regarding a family dispute involving
Silvia. Defendant asked Silvia about the dispute and tapped her shoulder. Silvia told him
not to involve himself and not to touch her; he then punched her in the face causing her to
fall backwards. He straddled her body and continued to punch her. She felt him cutting
her arms using a sharp object and she tried to push him off her. H. saw that Silvia’s arms
were bleeding and yelled for help. When H. tried to push or hit defendant, he turned
away from Silvia and grabbed H. by the shoulders; he stabbed her under her armpit with
what appeared to be a knife he was holding. Silvia tried to separate the two and pulled
defendant back, bringing them both to the ground. Defendant got on top of Silvia again
and punched her and stabbed her in the face and neck with the blade.
Defendant ran away, leaving Silvia bleeding. A witness saw defendant in the
kitchen washing blood from his hands and arms. When arrested, he still had dried blood
on his hands, arms, and face.
Various witnesses for the defense testified that Silvia grabbed, slapped, hit,
choked, and pushed defendant, and defendant responded only by pushing or slapping
Silvia. Defendant testified that when he arrived home that night, Silvia was walking in
the street screaming, and when he tried to talk to her, she strangled him and H. hit him in
the back. After about 10 minutes, he broke away from Silvia and saw blood on himself.
He did not know how Silvia became injured and claimed he never attacked her or washed
any blood from his hands. He admitted he had a nail clipper with a three-inch fold-out
knife in his pocket but said he never used it against Silvia. He testified that he drank
several beers that night and felt drunk; a blood test later revealed he had an approximate
blood-alcohol level of 0.12 percent at the time of the crimes.
Silvia sustained cuts to her back that required stitches to her arms and face; she
spent two days in the hospital and testified that she was scarred and required further
treatment.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}