People v. Baham CA2/3
── People v. Baham CA2/3 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: April 23, 2026
Category: General
Filed 4/23/26 P. v. Baham CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE, B344848
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. 24ARCF01230)
v.
JOSHUA BAHAM,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los
Angeles County, Kathryn Solorzano, Judge. Affirmed.
Omer A. Khan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,
for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
________________________
Joshua Baham appeals from a judgment after a court trial
that resulted in his conviction for three counts of grand theft.
Baham’s appellate counsel has filed a brief under People v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, asking us to review the record
independently.
In August 2024, the People filed a felony complaint
charging Baham with three counts of felony grand theft of
automobiles (Pen. Code,1 § 487, subd. (d)(1)). The complaint
alleged that Baham had a prior auto theft-related conviction
within the meaning of section 666.5 and had committed the
offenses while on probation (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(b)(4)).
After a preliminary hearing, the trial court found sufficient cause
to hold Baham to answer.
In September 2024, the People filed an information
charging Baham with the same offenses and allegations. Baham
pled not guilty to all charges and waived his right to a jury trial.
At the court trial, L’Tanya Bragg, a risk management
coordinator at Enterprise Rent-A-Car, testified about three cars
that went missing from its facility on Aviation Boulevard.
Enterprise’s facility has a surveillance system that records when
vehicles enter and exit, and it recorded when each of the missing
cars exited the facility.
The first car, a Mercedes worth $46,000, exited the facility
on June 18, 2024. Surveillance footage showed an individual
identified at trial as Baham driving the car. Baham wore a
reflective vest that people who shuttle or move cars for
Enterprise wear. However, neither Enterprise nor its vendor
1 All further undesignated statutory references are to the
Penal Code.
2
that was responsible for moving cars employed Baham. The
second car, a Maserati worth $122,000, exited the lot on June 20,
2024. The third car, a Mercedes worth $45,562, exited the lot on
June 27, 2024. When each car left the lot, a guard at the exit
made an entry in the guard log sheet, and Baham gave different
names each time he exited. None of the cars had been rented or
were scheduled for maintenance.
On June 26, 2024, Officer Angel Romo saw three people
sitting in a parked Maserati. Baham was in the driver’s seat,
and he had the car’s key fob in his pocket. A reflective vest was
in the trunk. Baham was arrested but released. Two days later,
on June 28, 2024, an officer met Baham at a location in Los
Angeles so that the officer could return Baham’s personal
belongings. When the officer arrived, he saw Baham loading
things into the Mercedes that had been taken from Enterprise on
June 27, 2024. The officer did not arrest Baham at that time.
But later that evening, Baham was stopped in the Mercedes for a
traffic violation. Three people were in the car, and Baham was in
the back seat. Baham had the car’s key fob in his pocket. A
black and yellow ve
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}