Hyatt Hotels Corporation & Subsidiaries v. CIR
── Hyatt Hotels Corporation & Subsidiaries v. CIR ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date: April 22, 2026
Category: General
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-3239
HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
No. 13858-17 — Joseph W. Nega, Judge.
____________________
ARGUED SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 — DECIDED APRIL 22, 2026
____________________
Before KIRSCH, JACKSON-AKIWUMI, and MALDONADO,
Circuit Judges.
KIRSCH, Circuit Judge. Hyatt Hotels operated a loyalty pro-
gram that allowed members to earn points by spending
money at Hyatt-branded hotels. The program’s expenses
were paid out of a centralized fund, which Hyatt managed
and to which all Hyatt-branded hotels—including those
owned by third parties in management or franchise agree-
ments with Hyatt—were required to contribute. The fund also
derived some income from investing in securities and selling
2 No. 24-3239
rewards points directly to customers. The Internal Revenue
Service contends that Hyatt should have reported income to
the fund as income to Hyatt; the tax court agreed. On appeal,
Hyatt renews its argument that these payments into the fund
weren’t its income. If they were income, Hyatt claims that it
should be able to use the trading stamp method of tax ac-
counting, which would offset that income by associated costs.
Because we find that the tax court’s analysis was incomplete
when it considered whether these payments into the fund
were Hyatt’s income, we refrain from deciding either of the
issues raised by Hyatt. Instead, we vacate the tax court’s deci-
sion and remand the case for further proceedings consistent
with this opinion.
I
A
Hyatt Hotels Corporation & Subsidiaries is an interna-
tional hospitality company that owns, manages, and fran-
chises hundreds of hotels. Some of these hotels are owned by
Hyatt, but other Hyatt-branded hotels are owned by third
parties in management or franchise agreements with Hyatt.
From 2009 through 2011, the tax years at issue, Hyatt owned
about 20 to 25% of the hotels that bore its name.
Like other hotel chains, Hyatt operated a loyalty program
during the tax years at issue, called the Gold Passport Pro-
gram (Program). The Program allowed members to earn re-
wards points by spending money at Hyatt-branded hotels,
which could later be redeemed for hotel stays and perks or
travel miles. All Hyatt-branded hotels, including those
owned by third parties, were required to participate in the
Program.
No. 24-3239 3
To cover Program expenses, Hyatt managed the Gold
Passport Fund (Fund), to which all Hyatt-branded hotels
(those owned by Hyatt and otherwise) contributed. During
the tax years at issue, hotel owners were required to pay 4%
of qualifying purchases (i.e., purchases that earned Gold Pass-
port points) into the Fund at the time the points were issued.
Alternatively, if a Program member opted to earn travel miles
instead of Gold Passport points, hotel owners paid into the
Fund the actual cost of the miles. The Fund also derived some
income from investing Fund assets in securities and directly
selling Gold Passport points to customers. When a member
redeemed points at a hotel, which might be long after the
points were earned, Hyatt compensated the hotel owner for
the stay out of the Fund. The Fund also covered administra-
tive and advertising expenses.
According to Hyatt, the Program was a critical part of the
company’s broader marketing strategy and contributed to in-
creased stays by Program members. During the years at issue,
Hyatt’s int
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}