John Ream v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury
── John Ream v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date: April 21, 2026
Category: General
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
File Name: 26a0117p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
┐
JOHN REAM,
│
Plaintiff-Appellant, │
│
v. > No. 25-3259
│
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; │
SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT; ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO │
TAX AND TRADE BUREAU; ADMINISTRATOR MARY G. │
RYAN, │
Defendants-Appellees. │
┘
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
No. 2:24-cv-00364—Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., District Judge.
Argued: December 10, 2025
Decided and Filed: April 21, 2026
Before: SILER, KETHLEDGE, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges.
_________________
COUNSEL
ARGUED: Andrew M. Grossman, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. Caroline W. Tan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Andrew M. Grossman, Kristin A. Shapiro, BAKER &
HOSTETLER LLP, Washington, D.C., Robert Alt, THE BUCKEYE INSTITUTE, Columbus,
Ohio, Patrick T. Lewis, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.
Caroline W. Tan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees. Michael Pepson, AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, Arlington,
Virginia, Thomas A. Berry, CATO INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C., Thomas R. McCarthy,
Tiffany H. Bates, CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, Michael A. Petrino,
CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, Washington, D.C., Reilly Stephens, LIBERTY
JUSTICE CENTER, Austin, Texas, for Amici Curiae.
KETHLEDGE, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which SILER, J., concurred.
MATHIS, J. (pp. 12–18), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
No. 25-3259 Ream v. U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, et al. Page 2
_________________
OPINION
_________________
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. For much of American history, evading excise taxes on
liquor has been nearly a national pastime. At the time of the Revolution, one historian has
written, “nearly every farmer distilled his own whiskey and deemed it his inalienable right to
evade the tax, and resist the collector whenever a favorable opportunity presented itself for doing
so.” Gallus Thomann, Liquor Laws of the United States 58 (1885). Soon after the Constitution’s
ratification, in western Pennsylvania, this evasion came by force of arms—in the Whiskey
Rebellion, which President Washington put down only after assembling “an army larger than any
he had commanded during the Revolution.” Gordon S. Wood, Empire of Liberty: A History of
the Early Republic, 1789–1815, at 138 (2009). Just after the Civil War, in 1867, a select
committee of the House of Representatives heard more than a month of testimony, and
concluded: “in the manufacture and sale of tobacco, cigars, and spirits, and especially the latter,
the most stupendous frauds are practiced against the government in the collection of its revenue.”
H.R. Rep. No. 39-24, at 1 (1867).
The following year Congress enacted comprehensive legislation to end those frauds
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}