United States v. Aaron Thompson

── United States v. Aaron Thompson ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: April 20, 2026 Category: CON USCA11 Case: 25-10058 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-10058 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AARON B. THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 ____________________ ____________________ No. 25-10134 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, USCA11 Case: 25-10058 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 2 of 6 2 Opinion of the Court 25-10058 versus AARON THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 ____________________ ____________________ No. 25-10176 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AARON THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 ____________________ ____________________ No. 25-10225 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ USCA11 Case: 25-10058 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 3 of 6 25-10058 Opinion of the Court 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AARON THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Aaron Thompson pleaded guilty to two counts of mailing threatening communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876(c) and received a 41-month sentence. On appeal, Thompson challenges his sentence as substantively unreasonable. The government has moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that: (1) the appeal is un- timely and (2) the sentence appeal waiver provision in Thompson’s plea agreement bars the appeal. We need not address whether the appeal is timely. E