Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections
── Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: April 20, 2026
Category: NEW
USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 1 of 2
FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-10343
____________________
CLARISSA GILMORE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
an agency of the State of Georgia,
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
in his official capacity,
ALBERTA W. MILTON,
individually and in her official capacity,
SABRINI CARLENE LUPO,
individually and in her official capacity,
SMITH SP WARDEN,
in his official capacity as successor-in-interest,
USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 04/20/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10343
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS,
individually and in his official capacity,
Defendant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00115-RSB-CLR
____________________
Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This matter returns to us on remand after the en banc
Court’s opinion reversing the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to Officer Alberta W. Milton and Officer Christina Iri-
zarry on qualified immunity grounds. Gilmore v. Ga. Dep’t of Corr.,
144 F.4th 1246, 1264 (11th Cir. 2025) (en banc). Based on the en
banc Court’s ruling, we remand the case to the district court for
further proceedings consistent with the en banc opinion.
REMANDED.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}