Sanchez v. Torrez
── Sanchez v. Torrez ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date: April 21, 2026
Category: General
Appellate Case: 25-2009 Document: 57-1 Date Filed: 04/21/2026 Page: 1
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
PUBLISH Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2026
Christopher M. Wolpert
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court
_________________________________
LUCIA F. SANCHEZ; MICHAEL F.
SANCHEZ, JR.; ERIK BRIONES;
RICHARD JENKINS; ROLAND
RIVERA,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. No. 25-2009
RAÚL TORREZ, in his official capacity as
Attorney General of New Mexico;
RICHARD STUMP, in his official capacity
as Chair of the New Mexico State Game
Commission; SHARON SALAZAR
HICKEY, in her official capacity as Vice-
Chair of the New Mexico State Game
Commission; TIRZIO LOPEZ, in his
official capacity as a member of the New
Mexico State Game Commission; GREGG
FULFER, in his official capacity as a
member of the New Mexico State Game
Commission; DR. SABRINA PACK, in
her official capacity as a member of the
New Mexico State Game Commission;
EDWARD GARCIA, in his official
capacity as a member of the New Mexico
State Game Commission; FERNANDO
CLEMENTE, JR., in his official capacity
as a member of the New Mexico State
Game Commission; MICHAEL SLOANE,
in his official capacity as Director of the
New Mexico Department of Game & Fish,
Defendants - Appellees.
_________________________________
Appellate Case: 25-2009 Document: 57-1 Date Filed: 04/21/2026 Page: 2
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Mexico
(D.C. No. 1:24-CV-00646-KWR-LF)
_________________________________
Christopher M. Kieser, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, California (Jeremy
Talcott, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, California; and Mark L. Ish, Felker, Ish,
Ritchie, Geer & Winter, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, with him on the briefs), for
Plaintiffs-Appellants.
James W. Grayson, Chief Deputy Attorney General, New Mexico Department of Justice,
Santa Fe, New Mexico (Raúl Torrez, New Mexico Attorney General; and Mark T. Baker,
Matthew E. Jackson, and Abigail L. Pace, Peifer, Hanson, Mullins & Baker, P.A.,
Albuquerque, New Mexico, with him on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________
Before PHILLIPS, McHUGH, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
_________________________________
The Plaintiffs-Appellants in this appeal are five New Mexico landowners: Lucia
F. Sanchez, Michael F. Sanchez Jr., Roland Rivera, Erik Briones, and Richard Jenkins
(collectively, “the Landowners”). The Landowners each hold title to non-navigable
streambeds of the Rio Tusas or Pecos River in New Mexico. The Landowners assert that
they once held the right to exclude members of the public from walking or wading in
their private streambeds but that the New Mexico Supreme Court changed established
property law and eliminated this right to exclude. Accordingly, the Landowners claim the
New Mexico Supreme Court’s decision amounted to a judicial taking of their right to
exclude without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
The district court concluded the Landowners lacked standing and that their claims
were barred by sovereign immunity. It therefore dismissed their Complaint under Federal
2
Appellate Case: 25-2009
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}