Gbenga Afolabi v. State of Indiana
── Gbenga Afolabi v. State of Indiana ──
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: April 15, 2026
Author: DeBoer
Category: General
IN THE
Court of Appeals of Indiana
FILED
Gbenga Afolabi, Apr 15 2026, 8:39 am
Appellant-Defendant CLERK
Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals
and Tax Court
v.
State of Indiana,
Appellee-Plaintiff
April 15, 2026
Court of Appeals Case No.
24A-CR-3081
Appeal from the Marion Superior Court
The Honorable Angela Dow Davis, Judge
Trial Court Cause No.
49D27-2111-F5-35434
Opinion by Judge Weissmann
Judges Bradford and DeBoer concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-CR-3081 | April 15, 2026 Page 1 of 31
Weissmann, Judge.
[1] Gbenga Afolabi was working as a prison guard at the Indiana Women’s Prison
when he was accused of forcing multiple inmates to engage in sexual conduct
with him. After a jury trial, Afolabi was convicted of two counts of rape, one
count of attempted rape, five counts of sexual misconduct, three counts of
official misconduct, and two counts of intimidation. Afolabi appeals these
convictions, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in making certain
procedural and evidentiary decisions. He also challenges the sufficiency of the
evidence to support one of his rape convictions and claims some of his other
convictions violate the prohibition against substantive double jeopardy.
[2] One of these arguments prevails but only in part. Applying the three-step
substantive double jeopardy analysis that our Supreme Court enunciated in
Wadle v. State, 151 N.E.3d 227 (Ind. 2020), we find Afolabi’s dual convictions
for the rape and intimidation of one of his victims gives rise to a presumption of
double jeopardy that the State fails to rebut. We therefore remand for the trial
court to vacate Afolabi’s intimidation conviction as to that victim and its
corresponding current sentence. We otherwise affirm.
Facts
[3] In 2021, Afolabi was employed as a correctional officer with the Indiana
Department of Correction, working night shifts at the Indiana Women’s Prison
(IWP). During the spring and summer of 2021, three IWP inmates—identified
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-CR-3081 | April 15, 2026 Page 2 of 31
as J.M., M.A., and L.B.—alleged that Afolabi forced them to engage in sexual
conduct with him while he was acting in his official capacity as a correctional
officer.1
[4] The first inmate, M.A., arrived at IWP in March 2021. M.A. was housed on a
unit where Afolabi worked, and Afolabi soon began making “flirty to sexual
comments” to M.A. about her hair, buttocks, and breasts. Tr. Vol. III, p. 160.
Not long thereafter, Afolabi started asking to see various parts of M.A.’s body,
including her genitals. M.A. initially “laughed it off and didn’t think [Afolabi]
was serious.” Id. at 162. But Afolabi began issuing M.A. disciplinary reports
that she believed could impact her release date. M.A. therefore began
complying with his requests to see parts of her body.
[5] In early May 2021, Afolabi requested that M.A. perform
← Back to Leanna Weissmann's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}