Olena Bahler v. Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC
── Olena Bahler v. Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC ──
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: April 20, 2026
Author: Dana Kenworthy
Category: General
FILED
Apr 20 2026, 10:01 am
CLERK
Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals
and Tax Court
IN THE
Court of Appeals of Indiana
Olena Bahler and Robert T. Bahler,
Appellants-Defendants
v.
Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC,
Appellee-Plaintiff
April 20, 2026
Court of Appeals Case No.
25A-PL-1922
Appeal from the Hamilton Superior Court
The Honorable J. Richard Campbell, Judge
Trial Court Cause No.
29D04-2504-PL-4597
Opinion by Judge Foley
Chief Judge Tavitas and Judge Kenworthy concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-PL-1922 | April 20, 2026 Page 1 of 11
Foley, Judge.1
[1] In this eminent domain action, Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC (“Citizens”)2
sought an easement across real estate belonging to Robert T. Bahler (“Robert”)
and Olena Bahler (“Olena”) (collectively, “the Bahlers”3) as part of a water line
project. The Bahlers appeal from an order (1) overruling their objections to
Citizens’ complaint appropriating their real property and (2) granting Citizens
an easement that included rights for sewer, gas, and other utility services in
addition to the water line. We find a single issue dispositive: whether the
easement granted to Citizens included use rights that exceeded the scope of
Citizens’ identified purpose of a water line extension.
[2] We conclude as a matter of law that Citizens did not establish a need for the
additional utility uses. We therefore reverse the order overruling the objections
to the scope of the easement sought and reverse the order of appropriation.4
1
We held oral argument on Thursday, March 19, 2026, at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney
School of Law. We thank Dean Bravo, the law school, and the Moot Court Board for their generous
hospitality, and we thank counsel for modeling skilled oral advocacy. We also thank the attending students,
who posed incisive questions to the bench and the advocates following the oral argument.
2
The complaint referred to Citizens Water of Westfield, LLC, but in appellate filings Citizens instead
identifies itself as Citizens Wastewater of Westfield, LLC. The parties do not address this discrepancy.
3
At times, this term refers only to Robert.
4
Our disposition renders the remaining issues moot. We therefore do not address the timeliness of Olena’s
objections or the merits of any other objection to the complaint at issue on appeal; should Citizens amend its
complaint pursuant to Indiana Code section 32-24-1-8(d), there will be a new timeline to file objections.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-PL-1922 | April 20, 2026 Page 2 of 11
Facts and Procedural History 5
[3] Citizens—an Indiana public utility—filed a Complaint for Appropriation of
Real Estate Interest on April 25, 2025, seeking a permanent, non-exclusive
easement across the Bahlers’ real property in Westfield, Indiana. Citizens
← Back to Elizabeth Tavitas's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}