O'SULLIVAN-SCHULTZ v. KORMAN
── O'SULLIVAN-SCHULTZ v. KORMAN ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date: April 20, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
ESTATE OF MARY
O’SULLIVAN-SCHULTZ, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
KORMAN, LLC, Defendant/Appellee.
No. 1 CA-CV 25-0440
FILED 04-20-2026
Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CV2018-012331
The Honorable Christopher Whitten, Judge
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
DePasquale Law Firm P.C., Phoenix
By Mark J. DePasquale
Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants
Knapp & Roberts, P.C., Scottsdale
By Craig A. Knapp, David S. Friedman
Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants
The Cavanagh Law Firm, P.A., Phoenix
By Karen C. Stafford
Counsel for Defendant/Appellee
O’SULLIVAN-SCHULTZ, et al. v. KORMAN
Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Judge Brian Y. Furuya delivered the decision of the Court, in which
Presiding Judge Andrew M. Jacobs and Judge James B. Morse Jr. joined.
F U R U Y A, Judge:
¶1 The Estate of Mary O’Sullivan-Schultz (the “Estate”) appeals
the superior court’s order dismissing with prejudice all claims against
Korman, LLC (“Korman”). The court’s judgment was filed after granting
summary judgment in favor of Korman on two separate occasions. For the
following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Mary O’Sullivan-Schultz (“O’Sullivan-Schultz”) was a
resident of Copper Village, an assisted living facility for individuals with
dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. O’Sullivan-Schultz’s residence had a
courtyard and a gate surrounding it. The gate was unlocked from the
outside so visitors could enter but locked from the inside to prevent the
residents from leaving the property without the knowledge of caretakers.
The gate also had a sign on the outside that read, “Please close gate securely.
Keep our residents safe.”
¶3 Korman contracted with Copper Village to provide
pharmaceutical services, including delivery of medications.
¶4 Around 2:00 a.m. on June 28, 2018, a Korman delivery driver
arrived at Copper Village to drop off medications for three residents, not
including O’Sullivan-Schultz. As the delivery driver opened the gate from
the outside, a barefoot O’Sullivan-Schultz approached the open gate from
inside the property. The delivery driver held the gate open while
O’Sullivan-Schultz exited the premises. The delivery driver asked
O’Sullivan-Schultz if she was allowed to leave, and O’Sullivan-Schultz said
she was. The delivery driver then waited inside the gated area to drop off
1 When reviewing a court’s grant of summary judgment, we “review
the facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-
moving party.” Rosenberg v. Sanders, 256 Ariz. 359, 364 ¶ 24 (2023) (citation
modified).
2
O’SULLIVAN-SCHULTZ, et al. v. KORMAN
Decision of the Court
the medications with a Copper Village employee. When the Copper Village
employee arrived, the delivery driver informed the employee that a
barefoot individual had left the property. After searching the area, the
employee reported O’Sullivan-Schultz missing to the police around 3:30
a.m.
¶5 O’Sullivan-Schultz was found deceased on July 7, 2018, and
the medical examiner listed her cause of death as environmental
hyperthermia. The Estate filed a wrongful death suit in November 2018
against Copper Village, Korman, and others. Korman is the
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}