B S v. D M, et al.
── B S v. D M, et al. ──
Case No.: 20A-AD-02198
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: May 24, 2021
Author: Judge Robert Altice
County of Origin: Allen
Category: Civil
Decision: Affirmed
Judge Kirsch and Judge Weissmann concur
Case Summary
[1]
In this contested adoption case, we consider whether the trial court clearly erred
in ruling that the adoptive child’s biological father’s consent to the adoption
was not required and that the adoption was in the child’s best interests.
We affirm.
Facts & Procedural History
B.S. (Father) and H.S.M. (Mother) were married briefly and lived with
Mother’s parents D.M. and C.M. (Grandparents) for several months. The
marriage was tumultuous, and Grandparents asked Father to move out in
September 2012.
← Back to Robert Altice's profile