Bicalho v. Administrative Director of the Courts
── Bicalho v. Administrative Director of the Courts ──
Court: Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Date: April 16, 2026
Category: General
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
16-APR-2026
08:11 AM
Dkt. 33 SO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
LEANDRO LARA BICALHO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS,
Respondent-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
HONOLULU DIVISION
(CASE NO. 1DAA-23-00008)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)
Petitioner-Appellant Leandro Lara Bicalho appeals from
the District Court of the First Circuit's December 29, 2023
"Decision and Order Affirming Administrative Revocation and
Dismissing Appeal" and Judgment. 1
On appeal, Bicalho contends the district court was
wrong in determining that the denial of his request to issue a
subpoena was harmless.
1 The Honorable Bryant G.F.Y. Zane presided.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to
the issues raised and the arguments advanced, we resolve this
appeal as discussed below, and affirm.
In January 2023, Bicalho was arrested for Operating a
Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII). Honolulu
Police Department (HPD) Sergeant Jared Spiker (Sgt. Spiker) and
HPD Officer Alvin Koike (Officer Koike) observed Bicalho
driving, and HPD Officer C. Oallesma (Officer Oallesma)
conducted the field sobriety test.
Six days later, the Administrative Driver's License
Revocation Office (ADLRO) revoked Bicalho's license. Bicalho
requested a hearing.
The hearing was initially scheduled for February 2023,
but was continued several times at Bicalho's request. During
that time, the Hearings Officer granted subpoenas for, among
other things, (1) the officers' body-worn camera footage of the
arrest and (2) Sgt. Spiker's disciplinary record "and other
records showing his dishonesty and untruthfulness."
By the June 2023 hearing, the Hearings Officer
received the records related to Sgt. Spiker but the case was
continued so Bicalho could request the video footage mentioned
in State v. Su, 147 Hawaiʻi 272, 465 P.3d 719 (2020). To that
end, Bicalho requested to subpoena "Steven Alm, the Honolulu
2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Prosecuting Attorney or custodian of potential discovery, for
the 'video of the incident at the ALA MOANA HOTEL discussed in
[Su] from State v. Thomas relating to [Sgt.] Spiker [(Thomas
Video)] which video has been previously provided to OVUII
defense attorneys in cases for arrests by Spiker.'"
The Hearings Officer denied Bicalho's request to issue
a subpoena for the Thomas Video. However, the Hearings Officer
"took administrative notice of [Su], specifically that 'the
still photograph of the [Thomas Video] show[s] that, contrary to
Officer Spiker's police report and trial testimony, Thomas did
not have his fists clenched and was not throwing punches.'"
(Third brackets in original.)
During the September 2023 hearing, Bicalho argued that
he could not properly question Sgt. Spiker without the Thomas
Video. The Hearings Officer affirme
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}