In The Matter of The Stephen A. Marks Foundation
── In The Matter of The Stephen A. Marks Foundation ──
Court: Court of Chancery of Delaware
Date: April 16, 2026
Category: General
COURT OF CHANCERY
OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE
CHRISTIAN DOUGLAS WRIGHT LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER
MAGISTRATE IN CHANCERY 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400
WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734
April 16, 2026
Daniel A. Griffith, Esquire Marion Quirk, Esquire
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P. Director of Consumer Protection
600 N. King Street, Suite 300 Delaware Department of Justice
Wilmington, DE 19801 820 N. French Street, 5th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: In the Matter of The Stephen A. Marks Foundation, Inc.,
C.A. No. 2025-0337-CDW
Dear Counsel:
Petitioner Mary Marks (“Petitioner”) has filed an Amended Verified
Petition for Instructions (“Amended Petition”) regarding The Stephen A. Marks
Foundation, Inc. (“Foundation”).1 Petitioner asks the court to validate her
election as the sole director of the Foundation as of August 9, 2023, a date
approximately six months before the special meeting at which she was
purportedly elected.2 The Attorney General does not object to the court
confirming Petitioner’s election but objects to the proposed effective date.3 The
1 Dkt. 13 (“Am. Pet.”).
2 Id. ¶¶ 13, 17.
3 Att’y Gen. Resp. to Am. Verified Pet. for Instructions, Dkt. 14 (“AG Resp.”) at 1.
The Attorney General has a long-standing common law responsibility to protect the
interests of the beneficiaries of charitable organizations governed by Delaware law.
See Oberly v. Kirby, 592 A.2d 445, 467–68 (Del. 1991).
C.A. No. 2025-0337-CDW
April 16, 2026
Page 2 of 14
Attorney General says the effective date of Petitioner’s appointment should be
no earlier than March 31, 2025, when Petitioner filed this action.4 I conclude,
for the same reasons I explained during the October 15, 2025 status conference
on the original Verified Petition for Instructions (“Petition”),5 that I cannot
grant the relief requested, so I must deny the Amended Petition.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts are drawn from the Amended Petition, the Petition, and the
exhibits attached to both. I take the averments as true for purposes of this
ruling but have not engaged in any formal fact-finding.
The Foundation was formed on October 23, 2007, when an incorporator
filed a certificate of incorporation with the Division of Corporations.6 The
Certificate states that the Foundation is organized and must be operated solely
as an entity exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code.7 The Certificate says the Foundation has neither stock
nor members,8 and it designates Stephen A. Marks, Petitioner’s husband, as its
4 AG Resp. 1.
5 Dkt. 1 (“Pet.”).
6 Certificate of The Stephen A. Marks Found., Inc., Am. Pet. Ex. A, Dkt. 13
(“Certificate”) at 1; see also Am. Pet. ¶ 3.
7 Certificate, art. 3d; see also Am. Pet. ¶ 2.
8 Certificate, arts. 4th, 5th; see also Bylaws of The Stephen A. Marks Found., Inc.,
art. VI, Pet. Ex. E, Dkt. 1 (“Bylaws”) (“The Corporation shall not have members and
shall have no authority to issue shares of stock.”).
C.A. No. 2025-0337-CDW
April 16, 2026
Page 3 of 14
sole director.9 Mr. Marks created the Foundation as a vehicle for “the
distribution of monies for charitable and other tax-exempt purposes and
providing educational activities and scholarships in the areas of marketing and
broadcast journalism.”10
Mr. Marks passed away on May 11, 2022.11 Mr. Marks’ estate (“Estate”)
was promptly opened and Petitioner appointed as its personal representative.12
Mr. Marks was
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}