Peo v. Schendorf
── Peo v. Schendorf ──
Court: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date: April 16, 2026
Category: General
22CA1785 Peo v Schendorf 04-16-2026
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals No. 22CA1785
Jefferson County District Court No. 21CR1192
Honorable Robert Lochary, Judge
The People of the State of Colorado,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lance Petersen Schendorf,
Defendant-Appellant.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
Division I
Opinion by JUDGE MEIRINK
J. Jones and Lum, JJ., concur
NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(e)
Announced April 16, 2026
Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, Brenna A. Brackett, Assistant Attorney
General, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Megan A. Ring, Colorado State Public Defender, M. Shelby Deeney, Deputy
State Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant
¶1 Defendant, Lance Petersen Schendorf, appeals the trial court’s
judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of one
count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance
and two counts of unlawful possession of a controlled substance.
We affirm.
I. Background
¶2 At 5:45 a.m. on May 6, 2021, Jefferson County Regional SWAT
used a battering ram to enter an apartment in Arvada. Once inside,
the SWAT team located seven individuals, including Schendorf.
¶3 The apartment had two bedrooms, an office, a bathroom, a
living room, a kitchen, and a dining area. The doors to all the
rooms were opened or unlocked, except for the office. Officers used
force to unlock the office door. After the SWAT team cleared out the
apartment’s occupants, detectives from the North Metro Drug Task
force began searching the apartment.
¶4 In the office, detectives found a desk with computer monitors,
several small bags, a glass pipe, a scale, prescription bottles, a
small scoop, and a container with a “white crystal” substance. They
also found mail with Schendorf’s name (but a different address) and
1
a prescription bottle with Schendorf’s name on it near the computer
monitors.
¶5 Detectives opened an unlocked safe on a shelf in the office and
found a white substance inside. During the search, detectives
found two bags of suspected narcotics at the bottom of a trash can
near the desk, which they collected for testing. Detectives found
another safe in the office’s closet. The second safe was locked, so
they pried it open. Detectives found a credit card with Schendorf’s
name on it in the second safe. Detectives didn’t find mail, credit
cards, prescription medication, or documents with any other
names, besides Schendorf’s, during their search of the apartment.
¶6 During the search, detectives found a total of 10.39 pounds of
methamphetamine and a tin containing pills. Of the pills found, six
tablets were identified as fentanyl — a schedule II controlled
substance — and fourteen tablets were identified as
methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) — a schedule I controlled
substance.
¶7 The People charged Schendorf with one count of possession
with intent to distribute a controlled substance under section 18-
18-405(2)(a)(I)(A), C.R.S. 2025, and two counts of unlawful
2
possession of a controlled substance under section 18-18-403.5(1),
C.R.S. 2025 — one for possession of fentanyl and one for
possession of MDA.
¶8 The jury found Schendorf guilty of all three charges, and the
court sentenced him to a controlling term of twenty years in the
custody of the Department of Corrections.
II. Analysis
¶9 On appeal, Schendorf contends that (1) the evidence against
him was insufficient to sustain a conviction for possessing a
controlled substance with intent to distribute; (2) the trial court
reversibly erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence; (3
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}