Peo v. Simpson
── Peo v. Simpson ──
Court: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date: April 16, 2026
Category: General
22CA0465 Peo v Simpson 04-16-2026
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals No. 22CA0465
El Paso County District Court No. 20CR2604
Honorable Frances Johnson, Judge
The People of the State of Colorado,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Laurence William Simpson,
Defendant-Appellant.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
Division II
Opinion by JUDGE FOX
Kuhn and Sullivan, JJ., concur
NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(e)
Announced April 16, 2026
Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, Paul Koehler, Senior Counsel, Denver,
Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Megan A. Ring, Colorado State Public Defender, Emily Hessler, Deputy State
Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant
¶1 Defendant, Laurence William Simpson, appeals his convictions
for attempted first degree murder and child abuse. We affirm.
I. Background
¶2 In the spring of 2019, Simpson, a Pennsylvania resident,
planned a summer trip to Colorado Springs with his ten-year-old
twins, C.S. and D.S. Two years earlier, Simpson had separated
from his wife and the twins’ mother, A.D. Before the vacation,
Simpson discussed his plans with A.D. and told her he intended to
fly to Colorado and rent a car for the return trip. On June 7, 2019,
Simpson and the children flew to Colorado. During the trip, he sent
A.D. regular updates.
¶3 Near the end of the trip, Simpson made “milkshakes” using ice
cream, Gatorade, and strawberries. But they tasted bad, and the
children refused to drink them. C.S. only took a sip, and D.S.
testified that he drank “one to two ounces.” At trial in 2021, the
children vaguely remembered Simpson telling them to finish the
shakes. D.S. testified that he was able to drink a bit more after
Simpson added more ice cream. C.S. was less certain that there
had been a second or “improved” shake. Ultimately, Simpson or the
children poured the shakes out.
1
¶4 D.S. testified that Simpson then gave him and C.S. “vitamins
or pills,” but he did not know what the pills were. D.S. swallowed
one pill but spit the rest out. C.S. did not testify about the pills.
The children testified that they felt normal that evening and the
next day.
¶5 At around 2:45 a.m. on June 13, 2019, Simpson called A.D. in
“total despair.” Simpson shared that he had quit his job after
telling his boss he was terminally ill, had no money because he
spent it on the trip and had “racked up credit card debt,” and he
did not know how to get himself and the children home. A.D. then
arranged return flights, and Simpson and the children arrived after
midnight on June 14.
¶6 Later that day, Simpson — hyperventilating and in tears —
called his friend B.M. B.M. testified that Simpson said, “[H]e gave
up” and “dissolved pain medicine in the kids’ shakes.” B.M. also
recalled Simpson saying that after the children refused to drink the
shakes, Simpson grabbed the shakes and “kind of snapped to it and
got the shakes and dumped them.” B.M. later told A.D. what
Simpson had said, and A.D. called the police.
2
¶7 A.D. took the children to get blood tests, which were negative
for drugs. Police also tested residue from the blender Simpson used
to make the shakes, which similarly yielded negative results. Test
results from red stains found on C.S.’s sweatshirt also proved
fruitless.
¶8 Simpson was charged with four counts of attempted first
degree murder (two counts per child under alternate theories) and
two counts of child abuse. § 18-3-102(1)(a), (1)(f), C.R.S. 2025 (first
degree murder); § 18-2-101(1), C.R.S. 2025 (attempt); § 18-6-
401(1)(a), (7)(b)(I), C.R.S. 2025 (child abuse). The jury convicted
him as charged.
II. Su
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}