D S v. Review Board
── D S v. Review Board ──
Case No.: 21A-EX-01629
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: June 22, 2022
Author: Judge Robert Altice
Category: Other
Decision: Affirmed
Judge Vaidik and Judge Crone concur
Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) benefits under the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. D.S. presents
two issues for our review:
1. Did the Review Board erroneously conclude that D.S. was not
entitled to PUA benefits?
2. Did the telephonic hearing held by ALJ Clark comport with
due process requirements?
We affirm.
Facts & Procedural History
In October/November 2019, D.S.
← Back to Robert Altice's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}