People v. Delarosa CA3
── People v. Delarosa CA3 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: April 16, 2026
Category: General
Filed 4/16/26 P. v. Delarosa CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Shasta)
THE PEOPLE, C103057
Plaintiff and Respondent,
(Super. Ct. No. 23F9833)
v.
JOURDAN DELAROSA,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Jourdan Delarosa asks this court to review the
record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more
favorable to him, we will affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In December 2023, Delarosa entered a Safeway store in Shasta County and put
three bottles of alcohol in a bag. A store employee who was familiar with Delarosa and
his history of stealing from the store approached Delarosa, who told her he was going to
stab her. Delarosa was later contacted by law enforcement and admitted taking three
bottles of alcohol without paying for them but denied threatening to stab anyone.
1
The People charged Delarosa with second degree robbery (Pen. Code,1 § 211) and
alleged that he had a prior serious or violent felony conviction for residential burglary in
2018 (§§ 1170.12 & 667, subd. (a)(1)). The information was later amended to allege
Delarosa was on bail in case No. 23F1622 when he committed the robbery (§ 12022.1).
Pursuant to a plea agreement with an agreed sentence of nine years four months in
prison, Delarosa pled guilty to robbery in case No. 23F9833, admitted the 2018
residential burglary prior strike conviction, and admitted the out-on-bail allegation. Also
pursuant to the plea agreement, Delarosa pled guilty in case No. 23F1622 to receipt of a
stolen vehicle (§ 496d, subd. (a)) and admitted the 2018 residential burglary prior strike
conviction. The People also agreed to dismissal of several other cases in exchange for
Delarosa’s pleas.
The court took Delarosa’s pleas and sentenced Delarosa in cases Nos. 23F9833
and 23F1622 in the same proceeding. In case No. 23F9833, Delarosa was sentenced to
the middle term of three years, doubled to six years due to the prior strike, on the robbery
conviction, and then an additional two years for the out-on-bail allegation, for a total of
eight years. In case No. 23F1622, Delarosa was sentenced to one third the middle term
of eight months, doubled to 16 months due to the prior strike. With both sentences
running consecutive, the total sentence was nine years four months, as the parties had
agreed. Delarosa was found to have 392 days’ actual credit and 58 days of conduct
credit, for a total of 450 days’ credit for time served. The court ordered Delarosa to pay a
restitution fine of $300 (§ 1202.4), with an additional $300 fine stayed (§ 1202.45). The
court dismissed the remaining cases against Delarosa with Harvey2 waivers for
restitution.
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2 People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754.
2
Delarosa filed multiple timely notices of appeal in case No. 23F9833 and was
denied a certificate of probable cause.
DISCUSSION
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}