United States v. Gerardo Morales-Ramirez
── United States v. Gerardo Morales-Ramirez ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date: April 17, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-3233
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Gerardo Morales-Ramirez
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Western
____________
Submitted: April 14, 2026
Filed: April 17, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Gerardo Morales-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1
after he pled guilty to being a felon found after illegal reentry. His counsel has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386
1
The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Iowa.
U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Having
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Upon careful review, this court concludes the district court did not abuse its
discretion in sentencing Morales-Ramirez. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d
455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of review); United States v. Miner, 544
F.3d 930, 932 (8th Cir. 2008) (presuming sentence within United States Sentencing
Guidelines Manual range is reasonable). Further, having independently reviewed
the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), this court finds no non-
frivolous issues for appeal.
The judgment is affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
______________________________
-2-
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}