United States v. Matthew Joseph Sheehan
── United States v. Matthew Joseph Sheehan ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date: April 17, 2026
Category: General
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 26a0175n.06
No. 25-1190
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Apr 17, 2026
KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE
) UNITED STATES DISTRICT
v. ) COURT FOR THE WESTERN
) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
MATTHEW JOSEPH SHEEHAN, )
) OPINION
Defendant-Appellant.
)
Before: SILER, MOORE, and BLOOMEKATZ, Circuit Judges.
BLOOMEKATZ, Circuit Judge. Following tips from multiple confidential informants,
police stopped Matthew Joseph Sheehan as he drove home from a suspected drug run. A canine
indicated that it detected drugs in the vehicle, and a subsequent search revealed illicit substances
in the trunk. Sheehan moved to suppress this evidence as the product of an unconstitutional stop,
but the district court denied the motion after concluding that the police had reasonable suspicion
to believe Sheehan was engaged in drug trafficking. We agree with the district court and affirm.
BACKGROUND
Michigan State Police’s investigation into Matthew Joseph Sheehan’s drug trafficking
activities largely stemmed from several confidential informants. In September 2022, two different
confidential informants told police that Sheehan trafficked illicit drugs from Minnesota and
distributed them in and around Iron River, Michigan. One of those informants described where
Sheehan lived and indicated that he drove a white car. In November 2022, a third confidential
informant, whom we refer to as CI 6402, reported that Sheehan was distributing illegal substances
No. 25-1190, United States v. Sheehan
in Iron River and told police they thought that Sheehan’s source was located somewhere to the
south of Iron River. CI 6402 also described where Sheehan lived and indicated that he drove a
white car. A few months later, CI 6402 completed a controlled buy of MDMA from Sheehan at
his residence, which was the same as the one described by the earlier informants. Police surveilled
the controlled buy and recorded audio from the transaction on a device carried by CI 6402.
Afterwards, police confirmed that the address where the buy took place, the vehicles located at
that address, and the phone number provided by one of the informants all belonged to Sheehan.
Later, a fourth informant also told police that Sheehan trafficked drugs into Iron River.
Around the same time, CI 6402 informed police that Sheehan was having trouble with his
methamphetamine supply source, who had possibly been arrested. But CI 6402 stayed in touch
with the officers and told them in February 2023 that Sheehan had found a “new source of supply”
in La Crosse, Wisconsin, Sheehan’s hometown. Mot. to Suppress Hr’g Tr., R. 112, PageID 679.
The next month, CI 6402 alerted police that Sheehan would soon travel to La Crosse to retrieve a
“large shipment” of methamphetamine. Id. at PageID 692.
The Michigan State Police were able to corroborate CI 6402’s tip that Sheehan had been
sourcing drugs in La Crosse with historic cell-site data. The data showed that Sheehan made
monthly trips to La Crosse and nearby Caledonia,
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}