Richard Reiter v. Troy Meink
── Richard Reiter v. Troy Meink ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date: April 17, 2026
Category: General
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 26a0177n.06
Case No. 25-5410
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED
Apr 17, 2026
KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk
RICHARD B. REITER, )
) ON APPEAL FROM THE
Plaintiff - Appellant,
) UNITED STATES DISTRICT
) COURT FOR THE MIDDLE
v. ) DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
)
)
DR. TROY E. MEINK, Secretary of the Air ) OPINION
Force )
Defendant - Appellee. )
Before: CLAY, McKEAGUE, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. Richard B. Reiter filed this lawsuit against the Secretary of
the United States Air Force1 after he was denied a promotion. Reiter claims the Air Force violated
the Administrative Procedure Act when it rejected his attempts to correct a record in his personnel
file, and then relied on this allegedly erroneous record to deny his promotion. The district court
ruled for the Secretary. Seeing no error, we AFFIRM.
1
Reiter originally filed this suit against Frank Kendall III in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Air
Force. Both parties agree that Dr. Troy E. Meink, the current Secretary of the Air Force, is now the proper
defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
No. 25-5410, Reiter v. Meink
I. BACKGROUND
Reiter served in the Air Force from December 27, 1993, to August 31, 1998. He then joined
the Air Force Reserves. In 2016, while serving as a Judge Advocate within the Air Force Judge
Advocate General’s Corps, Reiter was eligible for a potential promotion.
Per the Air Force’s promotion process, Lieutenant General Stayce Harris served as Reiter’s
Senior Rater. In that capacity, Harris filled out a Promotion Recommendation Form
(“Recommendation Form”) for Reiter and submitted it to the Air Force Reserve Line and Nonline
Colonel Promotion Selection Board (“Promotion Board”), the entity that would approve or reject
Reiter’s promotion.
Air Force regulations require a Senior Rater to provide the ratee a copy of the submitted
Recommendation Form before the Promotion Board makes a decision. So when Reiter received a
Recommendation Form in the mail (that bore what appeared to be Harris’s signature) ranking him
as the top candidate for promotion, he was expecting to hear good news. Instead, he soon learned
that he was not selected for the promotion. He also learned that the Recommendation Form
submitted to the Promotion Board was different than the one he received in the mail—it listed
Reiter as the second choice for promotion rather than the first.
A. First Attempt To Correct Recommendation Form
Reiter went to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“Correction Board”)
for a remedy. He requested the Air Force convene a Special Selection Board to reconsider his
candidacy using the version of the Recommendation Form that he received (which listed him as
the top candidate for promotion) rather than the version the Promotion Board received (which
listed him as the second choice). The Correction Board s
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}