United States v. Conchas-Mancilla
── United States v. Conchas-Mancilla ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: April 16, 2026
Category: Direct Criminal
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
____________
FILED
March 31, 2026
No. 25-40424
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jesus Arturo Conchas-Mancilla,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:23-CR-756-1
______________________________
Before Richman, Duncan, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
Jesus Arturo Conchas-Mancilla appeals the denial of his motion to
suppress cocaine discovered in his car after a canine alert at a border
checkpoint. We AFFIRM.
I
In April 2023, Conchas-Mancilla arrived at a routine immigration
checkpoint in Sarita, Texas. As he neared the checkpoint, Border Patrol
Agent Cory Whetten and his certified drug-detection dog, Badi, patrolled
around Conchas-Mancilla’s car for a free-air sniff. Near the rear driver’s
No. 25-40424
side, Badi began repeatedly straining to get under the car’s bumper, which
Agent Whetten recognized as Badi alerting to an odor. He signaled to Border
Patrol Agent Maxwell, further up in the inspection area, that
Conchas-Mancilla should go to “secondary,” where agents can inspect cars
more closely. Agent Maxwell told Conchas-Mancilla that a dog had alerted
to his vehicle and directed him toward the secondary inspection area. As
Conchas-Mancilla moved away from Badi to secondary, Badi barked and
exhibited other behavior showing his frustration at the odor’s escape.
Agent Whetten brought Badi to the secondary inspection area where
he again alerted to the car’s rear bumper. Concluding that Badi’s several
alerts provided probable cause, agents searched the car. They found 17.4
kilograms of cocaine hidden in the hollow tubing of the car’s bumper. Drug
Enforcement Administration agents detained and interviewed
Conchas-Mancilla. He confessed to drug trafficking after waiving his
Miranda rights.
Conchas-Mancilla was charged with drug conspiracy and possession
with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A).
Conchas-Mancilla moved to suppress the cocaine evidence, arguing
in part that Badi’s alerts did not provide probable cause to search his vehicle.
The district court held a two-day evidentiary hearing on his motion. Agent
Whetten, Agent Maxwell, and a Border Patrol canine training specialist
named Agent Hopper all testified for the Government.
The district court orally denied Conchas-Mancilla’s motion to
suppress. It found that Badi alerted to the car and that Agent Whetten
recognized Badi’s behavior as an alert. Accordingly, the court held that
Badi’s alert provided probable cause for the search. Conchas-Mancilla then
2
No. 25-40424
pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, but he preserved
his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress in his plea agreement.
Conchas-Mancilla now appeals.
II
When reviewing a suppression motion, we review factual findings for
clear error and legal conclusions de novo
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}