Clearview Electric, Inc. v. Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
── Clearview Electric, Inc. v. Public Utilities Regulatory Authority ──
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date: April 14, 2026
Author: Mullins
Category: General
************************************************
The “officially released” date that appears near the
beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be
published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it
is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the
beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion
motions and petitions for certification is the “officially
released” date appearing in the opinion.
All opinions are subject to modification and technical
correction prior to official publication in the Connecti-
cut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut
Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event
of discrepancies between the advance release version of
an opinion and the version appearing in the Connecticut
Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports
or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest version is
to be considered authoritative.
The syllabus and procedural history accompanying an
opinion that appear in the Connecticut Law Journal and
subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut
Appellate Reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the
State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced
or distributed without the express written permission of
the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial
Branch, State of Connecticut.
************************************************
Clearview Electric, Inc. v. Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
CLEARVIEW ELECTRIC, INC. v. PUBLIC
UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY
(SC 21121)
Mullins, C. J., and D’Auria, Ecker, Alexander,
Dannehy and Bright, Js.
Syllabus
Pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (§ 4-166 (5) (A)),
a “final decision” is “the agency determination in a contested case,” and a
“contested case,” for purposes of that act (§ 4-166 (4)), is “a proceeding . . .
in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by state
statute or regulation to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for
hearing or in which a hearing is in fact held . . . .”
The plaintiff electric supplier, C Co., appealed from the judgment of the trial
court, which had dismissed C Co.’s administrative appeal from the denial by
the defendant, the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), of C Co.’s
motion to withdraw its electric supplier license. In 2014, PURA had opened
a docket to redesign the standard billing format for residential customers,
and, in 2023, PURA issued a final decision in that docket, allocating the cost
of the redesign among the state’s licensed electric suppliers and ordering C
Co. specifically to pay an assessment of approximately $179,000. Prior to
that 2023 allocation decision, C Co. had entered into a settlement agreement
pursuant to which C Co. agreed, inter alia, to voluntarily withdraw from
the Connecticut electric supplier market for six years in order to resolve
certain allegations and claims against it. Shortly after PURA issued its
allocation decision, C Co. filed the motion to withdraw its electric supplier
license. PURA denied the motion without prejudice and directed C Co. to
pay the assessment. The trial court dismissed C Co.’s administrative appeal
from PURA’s ruling on the motion to withdraw for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction, concluding, inter alia, that PURA’s denial of C Co.’s motion to
withdraw its license was not appealable under the provision (§ 4-183 (a)) of the
Uniform Administrative Procedure Act allowing appeals from final agency
decisions insofar as PURA’s ruling was not a final decision in a contested
case for purposes of § 4-166 (4) and (5) (A). On appeal to this court, C Co.
claimed that the trial court had incorrectly concluded that it lacked subject
matter jurisdiction over C Co.’s administrative appeal. Held:
C Co. waived its claim that PURA’s denial of C Co.’s motion to withdraw
its electric supplier license co
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}