People v. Urrutia CA4/1
── People v. Urrutia CA4/1 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: April 15, 2026
Category: General
Filed 4/15/26 P. v. Urrutia CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D085707
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. FWV21004726)
NICHOLAS JAMES URRUTIA,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino
County, Michael A. Camber, Judge. Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Daniel J. Kessler, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for
Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury convicted Nicholas James Urrutia of first degree murder
(Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) and found true that he personally used a deadly
or dangerous weapon in the commission of the offense (§ 12022(b)(1)).
Appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under People v. Wende (1979)
25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 indicating he
found no arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks us to review
the record for error as Wende requires. We offered Urrutia the opportunity to
file his own brief, but he has not done so.
Based on our independent review of the record, we find no reasonably
arguable appellate issues. We remand for the trial court to correct
discrepancies between the court’s oral pronouncement and the abstract of
judgment. So modified, we otherwise affirm.
I.
A.
In late December 2021, Gabriel Fuentes entered his local bar at
roughly 9:00 or 10:00 p.m.
About an hour later, Urrutia arrived wearing a plaid flannel shirt.
Kristy J. and her aunt arrived at about 10:00 p.m., after Urrutia.
The bartender gave Urrutia water while he sat at the bar and talked
with Fuentes a couple seats away. At first, Urrutia and Fuentes’
conversation was friendly. About twenty minutes in, Urrutia mentioned
someone in his family had died, and Fuentes was supportive. Fuentes asked
whether Urrutia’s parents could have done something about it, and Urrutia
became “[v]ery angry and loud and completely changed.”
Urrutia stood up, slammed his hands on the bar, and said, “‘Are you
calling my parents chickens?’” Fuentes looked shocked but stayed calm.
Urrutia walked angrily out the front door. Fuentes went over to the jukebox
next to the door.
According to Kristy J., Fuentes was behind her and her aunt, who were
in the process of leaving, when the door swung back and “startled” her. She
saw Urrutia standing in the doorway holding the door open with his foot, and
she and her aunt went around him. As they did so, Kristy saw Urrutia was
holding a knife flat against his chest. He seemed to be looking past her and
2
her aunt. The door slammed behind them and they walked away. Kristy’s
aunt gave a similar account.
According to the bartender, when Urrutia first left the bar, she thought
he might be going to retrieve a weapon. She grabbed the keys to the door and
went to lock it, but before she got around the bar, Urrutia stormed back in.
After pushing the door inwards, Urrutia stood face to face with Fuentes and
screamed something akin to “You can’t call my parents chickens” before “very
forcefully” putting his hands on Fuentes’ chest. Fuentes stumbled backward
into a pool table, and Urrutia left.
Fuentes looked bewildered f
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}