S A, et al. v. R C, et al.
── S A, et al. v. R C, et al. ──
Case No.: 25A-AD-00749
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: September 30, 2025
Author: Judge Robert Altice
County of Origin: Parke
Category: Civil
Decision: Affirmed
Judge Pyle and Judge DeBoer concur
Case Summary
S.A. (Father) and A.H. (Mother) (collectively, Parents) appeal the trial court’s
order determining that Parents’ consent was not required for the adoption of
their minor child N.A. (Child) by Child’s legal guardians D.C. and R.C.
(collectively, Guardians). Parents raise two issues that we restate as:
1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion when it permitted
Guardians to present the telephonic testimony of a rebuttal
witness over Parents’ objections?
2.
← Back to Robert Altice's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}