Travis Clay Andersen, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent

── Travis Clay Andersen, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent ── Court: Court of Appeals of Minnesota Date: October 13, 2025 Category: General Decision: We therefore affirm In this appeal from an order denying postconviction relief, appellant Travis Clay Andersen argues (1) the district court abused its discretion by summarily denying his petition and (2) his sentence for a terroristic-threats conviction is unlawful. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the issues raised in Andersen's postconviction petition are procedurally barred and did not err in determining that his sentence is not unlawful. We therefore affirm.