Joel Marvin Munt, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent

── Joel Marvin Munt, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent ── Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota Date: July 16, 2025 Category: General Decision: Considered and decided by the court without oral argument 1. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s petition for postconviction relief as to his equal protection claim. 2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s petition for postconviction relief as to his claims of entrapment, trial counsel’s disregard of his “defense objective of choice,” and witness tampering. Affirmed. Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.