All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Apr 07, 2026

Milton K. Sanders, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent

── Milton K. Sanders, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent ── Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota Date: July 02, 2025 Category: General Decision: Considered and decided by the court without oral argument 1. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s motion to correct a sentence under Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 27.03, subdivision 9, because appellant’s consecutive sentences were authorized by law. 2. Any error in the district court’s failure to pronounce appellant’s criminal history score at sentencing was harmless. Affirmed. Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
CourtListener · Jul 02, 2025
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}