Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
── Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent ──
Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date: February 05, 2025
Category: General
Decision: Considered and decided by the court without oral argument
The district court did not abuse its discretion by summarily denying appellant’s petition for postconviction relief because, even if the facts alleged in the postconviction petition were proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence, appellant is conclusively entitled to no relief. Affirmed. Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}