All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Apr 07, 2026

Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent

── Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent ── Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota Date: February 05, 2025 Category: General Decision: Considered and decided by the court without oral argument The district court did not abuse its discretion by summarily denying appellant’s petition for postconviction relief because, even if the facts alleged in the postconviction petition were proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence, appellant is conclusively entitled to no relief. Affirmed. Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
CourtListener · Feb 05, 2025
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}