Choh v. Brown University
── Choh v. Brown University ──
Case No.: 24-2826
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date: April 02, 2026
Category: General
24-2826
Choh v. Brown University
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
SUMMARY ORDER
RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION
TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND
IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS
COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT
FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR
AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY
CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT
REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.
At a stated term of The United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley
Square, in the City of New York, on the 2nd day of April, two thousand twenty-
six.
PRESENT:
DENNIS JACOBS,
RICHARD C. WESLEY,
BETH ROBINSON,
Circuit Judges.
_________________________________________
TAMENANG CHOH, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, GRACE KIRK,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. No. 24-2826
BROWN UNIVERSITY, TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA
UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
CORNELL UNIVERSITY, TRUSTEES OF
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, HARVARD UNIVERSITY,
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, YALE
UNIVERSITY, COUNCIL OF IVY GROUP
PRESIDENTS,
Defendants - Appellees. *
_________________________________________
FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS: JOSHUA P. DAVIS, Berger Montague
PC, San Francisco, CA (F. Paul
Bland, Robert E. Litan, Berger
Montague PC, Washington, D.C.;
Eric L. Cramer, Alan Cotler, Berger
Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA;
Edward Normand, Richard Cipolla,
Freedman Normand Friedland LLP,
New York, NY, on the brief).
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE THE SETH P. WAXMAN, Wilmer Cutler
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP,
OF PENNSYLVANIA: Washington, D.C. (David Gringer,
Alan Schoenfeld, Wilmer Cutler
Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New
York, NY, on the brief).
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE Noah J. Kaufman, Morgan, Lewis &
BROWN UNIVERSITY: Bockius LLP, Boston, MA; Jon R.
Roellke, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
LLP, Washington, D.C.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE Karen Hoffman Lent, Skadden,
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY New York, NY; Amy Van Gelder,
OF NEW YORK:
* The Clerk’s office is respectfully directed to amend the caption as reflected above.
2
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, Chicago, IL.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE Norman Armstrong, Jr., Kirkland &
CORNELL UNIVERSITY: Ellis LLP, Washington, D.C.; Emily
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}