All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Apr 07, 2026

United States v. Danzavieran Durand Thurman

── United States v. Danzavieran Durand Thurman ── Case No.: 25-12186 Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: March 10, 2026 Category: NEW USCA11 Case: 25-12186 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/10/2026 Page: 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-12186 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANZAVIERAN DURAND THURMAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cr-00103-TPB-KCD-1 ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James T. Skuthan, appointed counsel for Danzavieran Thur- man in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to USCA11 Case: 25-12186 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/10/2026 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 25-12186 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Thurman’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
CourtListener · Mar 10, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}