United States v. Christopher Stanton, Jr.
── United States v. Christopher Stanton, Jr. ──
Case No.: 25-12351
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: March 30, 2026
Category: NEW
USCA11 Case: 25-12351 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 03/30/2026 Page: 1 of 8
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 25-12351
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL STANTON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 3:24-cr-00107-TKW-1
____________________
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After pleading guilty, Christopher Stanton, Jr., appeals his
convictions for (1) possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug
trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i); and
USCA11 Case: 25-12351 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 03/30/2026 Page: 2 of 8
2 Opinion of the Court 25-12351
(2) possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). For the first time on appeal, Stanton contends
that both § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and § 922(g)(1), as applied to him, violate
the Second Amendment, and thus the district court plainly erred in
sentencing him and imposing judgment.
As to § 922(g)(1), Stanton acknowledges that this Circuit’s
binding precedent expressly forecloses his constitutional
arguments. See United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768 (11th Cir. 2010);
United States v. Dubois, 139 F.4th 887 (11th Cir. 2025) (“Dubois II”).
As to § 924(c)(1)(A)(i), Stanton fails to cite any precedent from the
Supreme Court or this Circuit holding that § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) is
unconstitutional, and thus any alleged error was not plain. See
United States v. Moran, 57 F.4th 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2023).
After careful review, we affirm Stanton’s § 922(g)(1) and
§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) convictions.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 7, 2024, law enforcement executed a search
warrant at Stanton’s residence. In Stanton’s bedroom,
investigators found cocaine, marijuana, and ammunition. In the
kitchen, investigators found a Raven Arms .25 caliber handgun,
more ammunition, more cocaine, more marijuana, and drug
paraphernalia.
After being advised of his Miranda rights, Stanton admitted
to law enforcement that he (1) sold marijuana and cocaine; and
(2) knew about the .25 caliber handgun in his kitchen.
USCA11 Case: 25-12351 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 03/30/2026 Page: 3 of 8
25-12351 Opinion of the Court 3
During the search of Stanton’s residence, investigators also
located Stanton’s cell phone. Investigators obtained a search
warrant for Stanton’s phone. In the cell phone extraction,
investigators found multiple images of firearms, illegal narcotics,
and large sums of United States currency.
At the time of his conduct, Stanton knew he was a felon.
Stanton has (1) a 2017 Florida conviction for possession of cocaine;
(2) another 2019 Florida conviction for possession of cocaine; and
(3) a 2019 Florida conviction for possession of a controlled
substance without a prescription.
In November 2024,
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}