Virgil R. Smith v. Mike Harper
── Virgil R. Smith v. Mike Harper ──
Case No.: 26-10679
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: March 31, 2026
Category: NEW
USCA11 Case: 26-10679 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 03/31/2026 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 26-10679
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
VIRGIL R. SMITH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MIKE HARPER,
LEE MACON,
SHERIFF OF ELMORE COUNTY,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 2:25-cv-00129-ECM-KFP
____________________
USCA11 Case: 26-10679 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 03/31/2026 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 26-10679
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. The 30-day statutory time limit required Virgil Smith, a pro
se litigant, to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s Novem-
ber 19, 2025 final order and judgment on or before December 19,
2025. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However,
Smith did not file his notice of appeal until March 4, 2026. Accord-
ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
1300 (11th Cir. 2010).
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}