United States v. Williams
── United States v. Williams ──
Case No.: 25-7056
Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date: March 25, 2026
Category: General
Appellate Case: 25-7056 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 03/25/2026 Page: 1
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 25, 2026
_________________________________
Christopher M. Wolpert
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 25-7056
(D.C. No. 6:24-CR-00143-RAW-1)
GABRIEL LEE WILLIAMS, II, a/k/a Chi- (E.D. Okla.)
Chi,
Defendant - Appellant.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
_________________________________
Before MATHESON, MURPHY, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The
court, therefore, honors appellant’s request and orders the matter submitted without
oral argument.
Gabriel Lee Williams, II, appeals from the district court’s judgment accepting
his guilty plea to one count of being a felon unlawfully in possession of a firearm, see
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and sentencing him to a 140-month term of imprisonment.
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for
its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Appellate Case: 25-7056 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 03/25/2026 Page: 2
Williams’s counsel has filed an Anders brief, 1 asserting she could find no meritorious
basis for appeal and simultaneously moving to withdraw as counsel. For those
reasons set out below, this court grants counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismisses
this appeal.
A federal grand jury indicted Williams on one count each of possession with
intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),
(b)(1)(C), and on one count of being a felon unlawfully in possession of a firearm, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(8). Officers spotted Williams walking
with a red and black backpack. Williams had previously been convicted of multiple
felonies and had two active arrest warrants. When Williams saw the officers, he fled
on foot. Although officers lost Williams, they recovered the backpack. Inside the
backpack, officers found two firearms and a substance that tested positive for
methamphetamine. Several days later, Williams was arrested at a nearby motel, at
which officers also found suspected narcotics.
Williams entered a notice of intent to plead guilty to the felon-in-possession
count of the indictment. There was no plea agreement. As Williams’s trial counsel
explained, “We have an agreement with the government that the first count will be
dismissed at sentencing, but [there is] no formalized plea agreement as far as a plea
contract.” The court accepted Williams’s guilty plea and a presentence investigation
1
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2
Appellate Case: 25-7056 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 03/25/2026 Page: 3
report (“PSR”) was created. The PSR calculated Williams
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}