United States v. Glaze

── United States v. Glaze ── Case No.: 25-6133 Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Date: April 07, 2026 Category: General Appellate Case: 25-6133 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 04/07/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 7, 2026 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 25-6133 (D.C. No. 5:22-CR-00425-J-1) EDWARD TERRELL GLAZE, (W.D. Okla.) Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________ Before TYMKOVICH, PHILLIPS, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ Edward Terrell Glaze appeals the district court’s imposition of a 10- month term of imprisonment following the revocation of his term of supervised release. On appeal, Glaze argues that the district court’s *After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 34(f); Tenth Circuit Rule 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and Tenth Circuit Rule 32.1.  Appellate Case: 25-6133 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 04/07/2026 Page: 2 sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), we affirm. I In 2023, the district court sentenced Glaze to 37 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release after he pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). His term of supervision began on March 1, 2025. On April 23, 2025, Glaze’s probation officer filed a revocation petition with the district court, alleging, among other things, that Glaze tested positive for marijuana use on three separate occasions in violation of a condition of supervision. On May 19, 2025, the probation officer filed an amended petition, further alleging that Glaze had failed to submit urine samples and failed to attend his substance abuse treatment group. On May 23, 2025, the probation officer filed a violation report, noting Glaze’s highest grade of violation was C and his criminal history category was VI. The violation report calculated the advisory guideline range to be between 8- and 14-months of imprisonment and noted that revocation was mandatory under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(4) because Glaze had tested positive for illegal controlled substances more than three times over a one-year period. In that report, probation recommended an 8-month sentence. 2  Appellate Case: 25-6133 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 04/07/2026 Page: 3 On May 27, 2025, Glaze appeared before the district court for his revocation hearing. Glaze stipulated to the violations in the amended petition. After hearing from Glaze, his counsel, and the Government, the district court contin