Hodzic v. Bondi
── Hodzic v. Bondi ──
Case No.: 24-1696
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date: March 19, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
Nos. 24-1204, 24-1696
REDZO HODZIC; EDINA HODZIC,
Petitioners,
v.
PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General,
Respondent.*
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF
THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS
Before
Barron, Chief Judge,
Gelpí and Rikelman, Circuit Judges.
Melanie Shapiro, with whom Law Office of Melanie Shapiro,
LLC, was on brief, for petitioners.
Taryn L. Arbeiter, with whom Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Walter Bocchini,
Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, and
Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration, Civil
Division, U.S. Department of Justice, were on brief, for
respondent.
* Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2),
Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi is automatically substituted for
former Attorney General Merrick B. Garland as respondent.
March 19, 2026
GELPÍ, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated petitions
for review, Edina and Redzo Hodzic (the "Hodzics") seek review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals's (BIA) orders denying their
motion to reopen sua sponte and their motion to reconsider. The
Hodzics contend that the BIA's denial of their motion to reopen
rested on legal and constitutional errors. We deny the Hodzics'
petitions for review.
I. BACKGROUND
We gather our background from the administrative record,
which includes the Hodzics' testimony before the immigration judge
("IJ") in October 2001. See, e.g., Gonzalez-Arevalo v. Garland,
112 F.4th 1, 6 (1st Cir. 2024).
A. Entry into the United States
Edina Hodzic is a native and citizen of Serbia, formerly
part of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Her husband, Redzo
Hodzic, is a native and citizen of the Republic of North Macedonia,
formerly part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
The Hodzics are Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks) who, prior to entering
the United States, lived in the Sandzak region of Serbia. In their
brief, the Hodzics refer to the Bosnian genocide that took place
between 1992 and 1995 in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the Kosovo War
that ended in 1999 to describe the conditions existing in their
region right before they left Sandzak in 2000.
- 3 -
Edina testified before the IJ that the Hodzics fled from
Serbia in May 2000 because they grew fearful of the increased
presence of Serbian military forces in Sandzak following the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) bombing of Serbia in 1999.
They worried that conditions in Serbia or North Macedonia would
not be safe for their soon-to-be-born child.
On June 22, 2000, the Hodzics entered the United States
by presenting forged Slovenian passports at Dulles International
Airport in Virginia. During an interview with an Immigration and
Naturalization Service (INS) inspector at Dulles, the Hodzics
expressed fear of returning to Serbia and North Macedonia.
Accordingly, the INS (now the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS)) referred them for an interview with an asylum officer.
After the asylum officer determined that the Hodzics had a credible
fear of persecution, they were paroled into the United States and
placed in removal proceedings.
B. Procedural History
On June 26, 2000, the INS filed Notices to Appear with
the Immigration Court in Arlington, Virginia. The INS charged the
Hodzics as removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i) for
fraudulently or willfully misrepresenting a material fact
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}