Golden Kinsey v. Anitra Ford
── Golden Kinsey v. Anitra Ford ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: March 11, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 173
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CV-25-185
GOLDEN KINSEY Opinion Delivered March 11, 2026
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE OUACHITA
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
V. [NO. 52DR-24-145]
ANITRA FORD HONORABLE DAVID C. GRAHAM,
APPELLEE JUDGE
AFFIRMED
STEPHANIE POTTER BARRETT, Judge
Golden Kinsey appeals from an order of protection entered by the Ouachita County
Circuit Court prohibiting him from contacting appellee, Anitra Ford, for a period of ten
years and prohibiting contact with the parties’ minor daughter for a period of six months.
On appeal, Kinsey contends the circuit court clearly erred by (1) granting an order of
protection based on alleged conduct that occurred outside the state of Arkansas; (2) finding
he committed domestic abuse against Ford; and (3) finding he committed domestic abuse
against the parties’ minor daughter. We affirm.
I. Relevant Facts
Kinsey and Ford were married on May 17, 2014, in Louisiana. One child, a daughter,
was born of the marriage. Kinsey, who works in the oil field, was frequently away from home
for extended periods.
In June 2024, while Kinsey was out of town for work, Ford received two videos from
him that she perceived as threats to her life. As a result, Ford packed belongings for herself
and the minor child and sought refuge at a domestic-violence shelter in Louisiana. When
that shelter was full, she was referred to the Women’s Crisis Center of South Arkansas (“the
Center”) in Camden, Arkansas. Ford and the minor child were admitted to the Center on
July 1, 2024, and remained there until August 10, 2024. On July 23, 2024, while residing at
the Center, Ford filed a petition in the Ouachita County Circuit Court seeking an ex parte
order of protection against Kinsey.
In her supporting affidavit, Ford alleged that although she and Kinsey had been
married for ten years, the abuse began prior to the marriage. She described incidents dating
back to their engagement party where, she alleged, Kinsey slapped her and threw her phone
against a wall. She further alleged that over the course of their relationship, Kinsey burned
her with a curling iron, chased her with his truck, tripped her while she was pregnant, forced
her out of the home at night for refusing sexual intercourse, threw objects at her, and sent
threatening videos. Ford also asserted that their daughter was afraid of Kinsey and had told
her teacher that Kinsey was going to shoot Ford.
An ex parte order of protection was entered on July 23, 2024, and Kinsey was served
on August 5. On August 16, Kinsey filed a pro se motion to dissolve the order. In his motion,
he asserted he had not seen Ford or their child since June 3, 2024, and that Ford left the
marital home without informing him, leaving it in disarray. He denied any physical
2
altercations between them, claimed the incidents alleged in Ford’s affidavit occurred more
than eight years earlier, and characterized Ford as the aggressor.
A hearing on the petition was held on August 19, 2024. Shelly Otto, an employee of
the Center, testified the Center serves survivors of domestic violence, domestic abuse, and
human trafficking from all over the world, including individuals outside Arkansas. Otto
stated she served as Ford’s case manager and confirmed the dates of Ford and the minor
child’s residency.
Ford then testified. The court limited Ford’s testimony to in
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}