Earnest Maxwell v. Lavski Management, LLC
── Earnest Maxwell v. Lavski Management, LLC ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: March 11, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 182
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION IV
No. CV-25-186
Opinion Delivered March 11, 2026
EARNEST MAXWELL
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE SALINE COUNTY
V. CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 63CV-24-642]
LAVSKI MANAGEMENT, LLC
APPELLEE HONORABLE JOSH FARMER, JUDGE
REMANDED TO SETTLE AND
SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
Appellant Earnest Maxwell appeals the orders of the Saline County Circuit Court entered in
favor of appellee Lavski Management, LLC (“Lavski”), in this unlawful-detainer action. Maxwell
argues that the circuit court erred in (1) denying his motion to dismiss the complaint because Lavski
failed to attach the contract to the complaint; (2) denying him due process and sufficient notice and
opportunity to be heard; and (3) granting Lavski’s motion for issuance of writ of possession because
he timely filed a response to the notice of intent to issue a writ of possession against him. Because
the record presented on appeal does not contain a transcript of the August 28, 2024 hearing that
ultimately encompassed Lavski’s request for damages and all of Maxwell’s outstanding motions,
including his motion to dismiss, we remand to settle and supplement the record to include a
transcript of that hearing.
On May 6, 2024, Lavski filed a complaint in unlawful detainer against Maxwell. Lavski
asserted that Maxwell was in possession of its property pursuant to a lease agreement executed on
February 22. Lavski stated that Maxwell was in default of the lease agreement for failure to timely
make rental payments for February, March, and April 2024. Maxwell was given notice to vacate and
surrender possession of the subject property yet continued to unlawfully detain the property. Lavski
requested a writ of possession ordering Maxwell to vacate and granting Lavski possession of the
property.
Maxwell was served the complaint, summons, and notice of intent to issue writ of possession
on May 27.1 Lavski filed a motion for issuance of writ of possession on June 2, contending that
Maxwell failed to timely file an objection to issuance of the writ, and sufficient evidence was
presented to make a prima facie case of entitlement to possession of the property.
On June 3, the circuit court entered an order granting Lavski’s motion for issuance of writ
of possession against Maxwell. Also on June 3, after the order was entered, Maxwell filed an
objection to the issuance of writ of possession and a motion to dismiss and motion to quash notice of
intention to issue writ of possession. Without addressing Maxwell’s motions, the court issued the
writ of possession on June 6. On June 13, Maxwell filed a motion to quash and set aside the writ of
possession and an order granting motion for issuance of the writ.
A hearing on the matter was held August 28. Following the hearing, on September 5, the
circuit court entered a judgment granting Lavski’s request for damages in the amount of $31,494.24.
The court also denied Maxwell’s outstanding motions. Maxwell moved for reconsideration on
September 16. He appealed.
1 Both parties assert that Maxwell received service of the complaint on May 27, 2024; there
is no proof of service in the record on appeal.
2
On appeal, Maxwell argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
because Lavski failed to attach the contract—i.e., the leas
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}