Ashley Mask and Wyatt Conner v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child
── Ashley Mask and Wyatt Conner v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: March 11, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 168
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CV-25-472
Opinion Delivered March 11, 2026
ASHLEY MASK AND WYATT APPEAL FROM THE SHARP
CONNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
APPELLANTS [NO. 68JV-23-72]
V.
HONORABLE ADAM G. WEEKS,
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUDGE
HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR
CHILD
APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO
WITHDRAW GRANTED
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge
The Sharp County Circuit Court terminated the parental rights of Ashley Mask and
Wyatt Conner 1 to their daughter (MC, born 09/27/20). Mask has appealed and argues that
the circuit court erred in finding that she had not remedied the conditions that caused
removal and erred in finding that termination was in MC’s best interest. Counsel for
Conner has filed a motion to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v.
Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(j) (2025), asserting that there are no issues of arguable
merit to support an appeal. The clerk of this court made multiple attempts to send copies
of counsel’s motion and brief to Conner, including at the address provided by Conner to
1
Conner and Mask were married when MC was born.
1
the clerk’s office, informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. The packet
was returned to the clerk’s office with the message “Return to sender/not deliverable as
addressed/unable to forward.” We affirm the termination of parental rights as to both
parents and grant the motion to withdraw.
On 30 October 2023, the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS)
petitioned for emergency custody of MC. The accompanying affidavit explained that
DHS’s history with this family began in 2008 with reports of substance abuse and
environmental neglect. The affidavit also noted that MC has five siblings who have been
removed from Mask’s and Conner’s custody and adopted by other families.
The circumstances leading to MC’s removal began on October 26, when DHS
received a report of neglect and failure to provide necessary food, clothing, and shelter to
MC. The report alleged that MC was living with Conner in a camper with no electricity
or water and that Conner uses drugs in the home. The report also alleged that Conner
often leaves MC with an unknown male neighbor.
On Friday, October 27, DHS caseworker Ted Ford requested that officers from the
Sharp County Sheriff’s Office accompany him to Conner’s residence to investigate. Conner
was on probation for terroristic threatening toward a judge and DHS staff, and he also had
outstanding warrants. Officers met Conner at the front door of the camper and informed
him that he would be taken into custody for the outstanding warrants. Conner told DHS
that MC lived with her mother, not with him, but he was unable to reach Mask on the
phone. DHS exercised custody of MC and provided her with food and a medical exam,
which revealed a urinary tract infection. Mask contacted DHS and was told that DHS
2
would keep MC over the weekend. The circuit court granted DHS emergency custody on
October 30 after Mask tested positive for methamphetamine.
The court found probable cause to continue custody with DHS on November 1 and
found that the family would benefit from participating in the family-centered treatment
program. On December 5, the court adjudicated MC dependent-neglected on the basis of
parental unfitness due to drug use. The court set the goal of the case as reunification and
authorized DHS to arrange appropriate visitation.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}