Melissa Henry (Shoptaw) v. Shawn Henry
── Melissa Henry (Shoptaw) v. Shawn Henry ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: April 01, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 199
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CV-25-99
Opinion Delivered April 1, 2026
MELISSA HENRY (SHOPTAW) APPEAL FROM THE SALINE
APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 63DR-20-1034]
V.
HONORABLE KEN CASADY, JUDGE
SHAWN HENRY
APPELLEE AFFIRMED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
Appellant Melissa Henry (now Shoptaw) appeals from the Saline County Circuit
Court’s order finding sufficient changed circumstances to warrant a modification of appellee
Shawn Henry’s visitation with the parties’ minor child (“MC”). Melissa argues that the trial
court erred in finding that the parties had joint custody of MC and modifying their custody
agreement without requiring a material change of her circumstances; that even a modification
of visitation requires a material change of circumstances; that a modification of Shawn’s
visitation was a de facto change of custody without a material change of circumstances; and
that, alternatively, it was not in MC’s best interest to increase Shawn’s visitation. We affirm.
I. Background
The parties were married in July 2012; MC was born in 2016; and the parties divorced
by decree entered on March 31, 2021. By agreement of the parties, the decree provides that
Melissa is the fit and proper person to have care, custody, and control of MC subject to
Shawn’s reasonable parenting time. The decree further provides that the parties shall share
joint legal custody of MC with Melissa being the primary custodial parent. The decree
expressly states that
[j]oint custody means that before a decision is made the parties are charged with
consulting one another on the issue, taking into consideration as to what is in the
best interest of the child and not what is best for either party. In the event that the
parties are unable to reach a mutual agreement, then [Melissa] shall have final
decision-making authority. Each party will make the day-to-day decisions regarding
the child while he is in that party’s physical care.
The decree provides that Shawn’s parenting time includes every other weekend from
Friday at 6:00 p.m. until Sunday at 6:00 p.m. During the week, Shawn will have one night
of visitation beginning when school recesses for the day until 7:30 p.m. The decree provides
that the parties agree that the visitation night will depend on Shawn’s work schedule but
acknowledge that the night will fall between Tuesday and Thursday and that they will be
flexible due to Shawn’s work schedule. There is also a division of holidays, and Shawn is to
have three weeks of summer visitation. The decree provides that regular weekend and
weeknight visitation will be suspended for the summer visitation period and will resume
when school begins and that, if Shawn needs childcare during his weeks in the summer,
Melissa will provide that care.
On May 12, 2023, Shawn filed a “Motion to Modify Custody” alleging that Melissa
frequently interferes with his visitation in that she calls MC during his visits, which upsets
MC and undermines what Shawn is doing with him, and tells MC that he does not have to
2
stay with him (Shawn) and that she can come and get him (MC). Shawn also alleged that on
Christmas 2022, Melissa attempted to schedule a trip during his visitation, and when he
would not agree to give up his time with MC, she withdrew the extra parenting time he had
been receiving. Shawn alleged that Melissa threatens to withhold visitation if he does not
provide all of the transportation for visitation. Shawn further
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}