Trenton Simshauser v. Michelle Simshauser
── Trenton Simshauser v. Michelle Simshauser ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: April 01, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 198
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CV-24-272
TRENTON SIMSHAUSER Opinion Delivered April 1, 2026
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
V. [NO. 26DR-23-697]
MICHELLE SIMSHAUSER HONORABLE CECILIA DYER, JUDGE
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
Appellant Trenton Simshauser (“Trent”) appeals from the Garland County Circuit
Court’s order granting appellee Michelle Simshauser’s petition for an order of protection
and motion for contempt. Trent argues that the trial court erred in granting an order of
protection because there is insufficient evidence of domestic abuse and that the trial court
erred in granting Michelle’s motion for contempt. Specifically, with respect to the latter,
Trent asserts that he was wrongly denied a trial by jury for criminal contempt and that there
is insufficient evidence that he was guilty of civil or criminal contempt because of the lack of
clarity in the standing order that he allegedly violated. We affirm.
I. Background
The parties married in January 2021, and Michelle filed for divorce on September 12,
2023. The judge signed a standing order, which provided the following in relevant part:
5. Neither party shall threaten, injure, molest or harass the other party or any of
the minor or adult child/ren of the parties.
6. Neither party shall spend or dispose of any monetary assets (money) except for
normal/routine living expenses or normal/routine business expenses and
neither party shall cancel health insurance, automobile insurance, or other
casualty or property damage insurance, cell phones, utilities, or other
necessities of life without order of the Court or written agreement between
the parties filed with the Court.
7. There shall be no cash withdrawals from any marital account in excess of one
hundred dollars ($100.00) per day or transfer funds held on deposit in any
marital account without order of the Court or written agreement of the parties
filed with the Court.
On October 31, Michelle filed a motion for contempt alleging that Trent had violated
paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 of the standing order. Specifically, she alleged that Trent had called
her cell phone approximately thirty-six times in an eight-hour period; that he had made
fourteen Facebook audio calls to her in a day; that he texts her minor children and family
members when she does not answer his calls; that he screams into the Ring doorbell camera
and through the Amazon Alexa device at the marital home when she does not answer his
calls; that he has access to her phone and social media and contacts people with whom she
communicates; that he threatens to report her (a nurse) to the Arkansas Board of Nursing
for verbally and mentally abusing him—a disabled veteran and sexual-assault survivor; that he
copied her on an email to the Arkansas Inspector General in which he stated that she had
committed identity theft and fraud; that he harasses and humiliates her by posting on social
media; that he calls and screams at her, calls her a liar, and threatens to not pay the mortgage,
to disconnect the utilities, and to cancel the car insurance; that on October 26, 2023, he
2
canceled the internet and streaming services to the marital home; that he threatened to
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}