jbi/twin v. Palacios
── jbi/twin v. Palacios ──
Case No.: 1 CA-IC 25-0017
Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date: March 12, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
JBI LLC, Petitioner Employer,
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE CO, Petitioner Carrier,
v.
THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
FRANCISCO PALACIOS, Respondent Employee.
No. 1 CA-IC 25-0017
FILED 03-12-2026
Special Action - Industrial Commission
ICA Claim No. 20223010101
Carrier Claim No. Y3VC33273
The Honorable Kevin B. Berkowitz, Administrative Law Judge
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
Ritsema Law, Phoenix
By Alissa J. Mack, Karolyn F. Keller
Counsel for Petitioner Employer and Carrier
Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix
By Afshan Peimani
Counsel for Respondent
Snow & Carpio PLC, Phoenix
By Erica Gonzalez-Melendez
Counsel for Respondent Employee
JBI/TWIN v. PALACIOS
Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court, in
which Judge Andrew J. Becke and Judge Kent E. Cattani joined.
T H U M M A, Judge:
¶1 Petitioners JBI, LLC, doing business as Western Millwork,
and Twin City Fire Insurance Co. challenge an Industrial Commission of
Arizona (ICA) award finding Francisco Palacios requires further active
medical treatment and authorizing lower back surgery. Because it is
supported by substantial evidence in the record, the award is affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Palacios had worked for Western Millwork for about 10 years
at the time of his claim. His job included lifting sheets of granite and marble.
Medical records show that, in 2019, he sought medical treatment at an
emergency room (ER) for low back pain. An X-ray revealed mild disc
degeneration, and he was given pain medication and told to avoid heavy
lifting. In 2021, he again sought medical treatment for work-related low
back pain.
¶3 In the fall of 2022, Palacios made three ER visits for back pain.
On September 11, 2022, the ER took lumbar spine X-rays and noted a
normal impression. Palacios was referred to his primary care physician for
follow-up. On September 15, 2022, again at the ER, he was diagnosed with
a muscle spasm and sent home with pain medications. The treatment notes
state “no numbness tingling or radiculopathy” in his lower extremities. A
medical record for the third ER trip on October 15, 2022, states that Palacios
had suffered an exacerbation of preexisting back pain, noting “no
numbness or tingling or weakness.”
¶4 Palacios filed a workers’ compensation claim in October 2022,
designating a September 29, 2022 injury date. Petitioners accepted his claim
and he received treatment. In February 2024, based on an independent
medical examination (IME) by Dr. Dennis Crandall, Petitioners closed the
claim with no permanent impairment. Palacios protested the closure as well
as Petitioners’ denial of authorization for back surgery recommended by
his treating physician.
2
JBI/TWIN v. PALACIOS
Decision of the Court
¶5 At a September 2024 evidentiary hearing, Palacios testified
that the injury occurred on September 29, 2022, when he was lifting heavy
material and his lower back “popp[ed].” Western Millwork immediately
sent him to a clinic that diagnosed a lumbar strain and gave him pain
medication and instructions for home physical therapy. In April 2023 he
re
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}