State v. Rix
── State v. Rix ──
Case No.: 1 CA-CR 24-0046
Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date: March 19, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA,
Appellee,
v.
SEAN DAVID RIX,
Appellant.
No. 1 CA-CR 24-0046
FILED 03-19-2026
Appeal from the Superior Court in Mohave County
No. S8015CR201901104
The Honorable Lee Frank Jantzen, Judge
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
Janelle A. McEachern, Chandler
Counsel for Appellant
Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix
By Casey D. Ball
Counsel for Appellee
STATE v. RIX
Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court, in
which Judge Andrew M. Jacobs and Judge David D. Weinzweig joined.
T H U M M A, Judge:
¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297 (1969). Counsel for defendant Sean
David Rix initially advised the court that, after searching the entire record,
she found no arguable question of law and asked this court to conduct an
Anders review. Rix was given the opportunity to file a supplemental brief
but has not done so. This court has reviewed the record, including
supplemental briefing discussed below, and has found no reversible error.
Accordingly, Rix’s convictions and resulting sentence and probation grant
are affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 In 2019, a detective with the Mohave County Sheriff’s Office
conducted an undercover investigation targeting individuals who used the
internet to sexually exploit children. The detective created an online
persona posing as “Taylor Gates,” a 13-year-old minor female. There was,
in fact, no 13-year-old Taylor Gates; the officer created the fictional persona
as part of the undercover investigation. In response to that posting, an email
from “Bob Bobbers” requested models to pose for illicit photographs. In
April 2019, when Taylor Gates emailed asking “Do you like younger girls?,”
Bob Bobbers responded “Yeah, I do.” When Taylor Gates sent an email
stating “I’m 13. If you don’t care, then I don’t,” Bob Bobbers responded
“Pic?”
¶3 Later, Taylor Gates sent an email stating, “I’m 13, so if you’re
not cool with that, then bye.” Bob Bobbers responded, “I’m definitely cool
with that,” and asked to “meet up.” Four times, Bob Bobbers also asked for
illicit photos from Taylor Gates.
¶4 The detective obtained a search warrant for the Bob Bobbers’
email account. That search yielded a phone number and other identifying
information that were traced to Rix. When interviewed, Rix admitted using
2
STATE v. RIX
Decision of the Court
the Bob Bobbers name and email address in contacting the Taylor Gates
persona.
¶5 Rix was charged with two counts of attempted commercial
sexual exploitation of a minor, Class 3 felonies and dangerous crimes
against children (DCAC), committed in Mohave County in April and May
2019. After being convicted as charged at a March 2022 trial, those
convictions were reversed on appeal, resulting in a retrial. See State v. Rix,
256 Ariz. 125, 128 ¶ 1 (App. 2023). At that January 2024 retrial, a different
jury found Rix guilty as charged, also finding that Rix “knew or had reason
to know the purported minor was under 15 years of age.” The court late
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}