Highland Rim Investments, LLC v. Kindra Cooper
── Highland Rim Investments, LLC v. Kindra Cooper ──
Case No.: SC-2025-0621
Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date: March 27, 2026
Author: Wise
Category: General
Rel: March 27, 2026
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter.
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue,
Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections
may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter.
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
OCTOBER TERM, 2025-2026
_________________________
SC-2025-0599
_________________________
Highland Rim Investments, LLC, and Monique Dollone
v.
Kindra Cooper
_________________________
SC-2025-0621
_________________________
Highland Rim Investments, LLC
v.
Kindra Cooper
Appeals from Madison Circuit Court
(CV-22-900037)
WISE, Justice.
SC-2025-0599 and SC-2025-0621
In case number SC-2025-0599, Highland Rim Investments, LLC,
and Monique Dollone appeal from a judgment, based on a jury's verdict,
entered against them and in favor of Kindra Cooper by the Madison
Circuit Court.1 In case number SC-2025-0621, Highland Rim appeals
from the trial court's order appointing a receiver over Highland Rim. We
reverse the trial court's judgment in favor of Cooper and its order
appointing a receiver over Highland Rim.
Facts and Procedural History
This case arose from a May 12, 2021, sales contract pursuant to
which Cooper agreed to purchase a house in Madison County ("the
property") from Highland Rim. At the time, Thomas Rohrbacher was
the sole member of Highland Rim and his wife, Dollone, was the manager
of Highland Rim. The parties entered into three agreements to extend
1The notice of appeal in case number SC-2025-0599 also listed
Thomas Rohrbacher and M International, LLC, as appellants. Cooper
submitted to the jury only claims of misrepresentation and suppression
against Rohrbacher and M International. The jury found in favor of
Rohrbacher and M International as to those claims, and the trial court
entered a judgment in their favor on those claims. The trial court
subsequently granted Cooper's motion to pierce the corporate veil of
Highland Rim as to Rohrbacher. However, Rohrbacher has not presented
any argument challenging the trial court's decision to pierce the
corporate veil. We have changed the style of this appeal accordingly.
2
SC-2025-0599 and SC-2025-0621
the closing date because Highland Rim was not able to close. However,
the closing never took place.
On January 11, 2022, Cooper filed a "Complaint for Specific
Performance, Declaratory Judgment & Damages" against Highland Rim
and various fictitiously named defendants in the trial court. Cooper
asserted breach-of-contract claims in which she asked the trial court "[t]o
determine and declare the rights and obligations of the parties" under
the sales contract, requested specific performance of the sales contract,
and requested damages. Cooper subsequently amended her complaint
several times. In those amendments, she added Rohrbacher, Dollone, M
International, Inc., and the Rohrbacher Trust dated May 16, 2011 ("the
trust"), as additional defendants. She also added claims of unjust
enrichment, suppression, reckless misrepresentation, fraudulent
misrepresentation, innocent misrepresentation, and deceptive trade
practices against all the defendants. Cooper also included a count in
whi
← Back to Kelli Wise's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}