SHAH ALAM v. SHAVON J. TUCKER

── SHAH ALAM v. SHAVON J. TUCKER ── Case No.: 21A-SC-00080 Court: Indiana Court of Appeals Date: October 07, 2021 Author: Judge L. Mark Bailey Category: Civil Decision: Rehearing Judge May and Judge Robb concur [1] Alam petitions for rehearing, arguing that Tucker was not entitled to withhold rent under Indiana law or the terms of the lease for alleged habitability issues,1 and that she failed to pay a security deposit.2 He observes that Indiana has no statute authorizing withholding of rent based upon lack of habitability and Tucker neither filed an independent action nor asserted a counterclaim against Alam alleging deficiencies of the leased premises.