All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion Mar 01, 2026

Petersons Home Improvements Inc v. Michael L Einterz, Jr.

── Petersons Home Improvements Inc v. Michael L Einterz, Jr. ── Case No.: 21A-PL-00946 Court: Indiana Court of Appeals Date: November 23, 2021 Author: Judge L. Mark Bailey County of Origin: Hamilton Category: Civil Decision: Affirmed Judge Crone and Judge Pyle concur Einterz represented the Employee in an action against PHI for the alleged violation of the Indiana Wage Payment Act. Among the allegations was that PHI had improperly reduced the Employee’s wages in an amount equal to PHI’s share of federal payroll taxes. The Employee sought approximately $21,500 in the alleged underpayment of wages, the bulk of which—$17,400— was purportedly associated with the tax-related sums.
Indiana Judicial Branch
https://public.courts.in.gov/Decisions/api/Document/Opinion?Id=aiboFq6kgnW9gOFF…
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}