P S v. R S
── P S v. R S ──
Case No.: 23A-PO-02159
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: March 13, 2024
Author: Judge L. Mark Bailey
County of Origin: Vigo
Category: Civil
Decision: Reversed and Remanded
Judge Crone and Judge Pyle concur
1
Given our holding, it is unnecessary to address P.S.’s constitutional claim that the trial court’s mutual
restraining order violated her First Amendment right to free speech under the United States Constitution.
[2]
At the beginning of his sophomore year in high school, R.S. created a video of
himself “spelling . . . out a racist slur.” (Id.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}