Secret America LIVE - Episode 75 - Interview w/ Eric Burlison - The Truth is out [5:04-10:13]

Now that being said, like Arrow, you know, I think that whenever I spoke with them, a lot of people think that Arrow was kind of a catch was kind of a, what do you call it? Disinfo? Yeah. And it may be, but what I, what I will say is I think that the current director seems to be truly trying to get to the truth. And I think that like Tim Phillips, for example, was willing to get to the truth. It was also kind of highly skeptical, kind of like me, but I do think that they were diligently trying to get to the truth. Now that a lot of times, things that they were recovering were things that they couldn't that were like foreign objects by some of our adversaries. And so, so, or items that were being developed by some of our, by some of our advanced military tech. That's true. I mean, witness eyewitness testimony is, is wholly unreliable. I mean, you just, you just never know memories can be, you know, manipulated, altered. You know, people can think they saw something, but they didn't. So, you know, it's hard to, hard to trust eyewitness testimony, right, James? Yeah. Let me just give, maybe give the audience a little background. Eric was part of a multi session congressional briefing back in May over UAP. If you're wondering why we just jumped into UAPs. And like you said, you just recently announced that David Grush is going to be an advisor. Now, Grush had very high security clearance. And his testimony, I encourage everyone to go watch it because to me, it was absolutely stunning. Eric, as you know, you and I've talked about this many times, I've been into the whole UFO UAP thing for well over a decade. I'm thoroughly convinced that there is nonhuman intelligence. I have no idea where it comes from. It might be spiritual. It might be nuts and bolts. I don't know, but I wanted to give the audience a little background because we kind of jumped into that. So what tell us about arrow? What is arrow? And why did the leadership get replaced? So arrow is, you know, one of those, it's an acronym for some a government, I don't, I'm not really going to remember. Like ants, reconnaissance, reconnaissance and something. All domain anomaly resolution office or something like that. That agency was stood up to investigate the UAP phenomenon on the unidentified aerial phenomenon. And they created a team of people that they pulled from different agencies. So you had someone from people from the CIA, you had people from Department of Defense, you had people from the NSA, all kind of working on this project. And the goal is to find things, you know, run them to ground, figure out what really happened and then, and then where they can declassify. And they've declassified a number of events and videos you can go to their website and see. And so, look, I think that at the end of the day, what became apparent to me and what one of the flaws of that agency is that a lot of their requests and a lot of people there were, you know, seeking, you know, to come testify and provide testimony are either not in the private sector where a lot of these, where a lot of this, I'm told lies. Or they were really at the White House SAP level is the special access program level on front at the White House level, which, which they feel like at that level, they don't have to follow the normal guidelines that one of the one of the agencies has to follow. COD has to provide information to Congress on a regular basis, at least to the House on Services Committee to the Senate Armed Service Committee to the gang of eight, right. The Intel, you know, CIA intelligence agencies have to provide just, you know, some kind of briefing to or oversight to House Intelligence Committee Senate Intelligence. Yeah, yeah, right. But, but if you're in the White House program, if you're White House special access, they don't necessarily are, they're not necessarily required to do that. And so, the, there's also a constitutional debate, the, you know, the executive branch has the authority to classify things. Some people believe that that authority only gives them the authority to classify items within their own, you know, their own article within article two.